During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14
Bats are seeking sanctuary in churches - but they're making an unholy mess，推荐阅读WPS下载最新地址获取更多信息
“现在L3的适用范围（ODD）过窄，无法快速普及。”国家新能源创新中心一位测试工程师表示，当前L3测试适用范围只是集中在市区跟车儒行和高速规定线路行驶，“更多适用范围需要等待法律法规扩充。”，更多细节参见91视频
Unreal Native AOT Interop
"One day I just woke up and after a year-and-a-half on the streets I thought, 'I need to do something'," he says, remembering how he approached a local charity for support.，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载